Four years ago I asked some questions about the animal welfare institute of new Zealand.(AWINZ)
It plays a public role in law enforcement and contracts to Central and Local Government. And has obtained significant public funds through a fundraising campaign using council logos, with which they have sued me in an attempt to silence me .
I proved categorically that this “organisation’ did not exist as a legal person in its own right and was nothing more than a trading name for one person.
In four years of questioning accountability with the crown nothing has been done . Rodney Hide the Mp for local government and my local MP who helped me before the last elections now claims through his staff that there is a conflict of interest.
Does this mean that the crown condones the use of fictitious organisations?
Why can’t I get a reply from the Ombudsmen why is the office of the auditor general dismissing me when they should be asking questions why the government and local government contracted to a trading name .
Why does the government condone some one writing legislation for their own business ventures?
Why do truth and honest play such small roles and why are persons such as myself persecuted for speaking and seeking the truth.
Do we condone the use of fictitious names ? If so why don’t we all start using trading names?
For your next contract you could be Peter Pan , Mary Poppins it appears that it is acceptable to Government after all if it is OK by the auditor general for Waitakere city and MAF to contract to a fiction why can’t we each become one .. one rule for all is what I say !
How can New Zealand be the least corrupt if we condone the use of fictional names?
Anticorruptionnz's Blog 