I would like to take this opportunity to advise you of the inaccuracy of the reporting of Jock Anderson on the defamation issue relating to myself and Mr wells
I have posted replies on your site only to see them taken down again. What has happened to me has to be of concern to the average new Zealander .. the right to speak the truth.
Jock Anderson is apparently being sued By Eugine Orlov My lawyer.. that has nothing to do with me and I do not wish to be involved.
Jock in his second article starts off “Flames of a bitter defamation which accused Waitakere city councillor and animal loving lawyer Neil Wells of conspiracy, fraud, misappropriation and embezzlement were fanned again in the High Court at Auckland.”
- Mr Wells is not a city councillor
- I have not been taken to court for accusing Mr wells of conspiracy, fraud, misappropriation and embezzlement.
- The contents of the statement of claim in so far as the statements I made have in fact all been proved to be true.
Also the three people who claimed to be trustees of AWINZ had no proof at all that they were . Much of the background information in the Statement of claim is fictional and is not reflected in the documents I have since obtained from MAF.
The miscarriage of justice is that I have never been found guilty of defaming Mr Wells , My defence was struck out by careful legal manipulation and Mr Wells never proved that what I said was untrue or that I knew that my statements were untrue.
I questioned corruption being that a person in public office contracts to himself using the staff under his control to obtain funds for his unseen trust to which only he controlled the bank account.
While my truth was called lies Mr wells uncorroborated statements have been accepted simply on his say so . It appears that being a barrister is enough to be believed but as an Investigator & former police sergeant armed with mountains of evidence I am considered a liar.
I have further proved that this man had a business plan and wrote legislation for it even advising the select committee and MAf during the transition of the bill into law . I have a lot of FACTUAL information on my blog including how to write legislation for your own business plan How to get your litigation funded through the public purse and
I would imagine that many new Zealanders would be shocked to find that you can have your life devastated because you question the activities of something which appears not to exist. And when that nonexistent trust enforces the law we have a duty to ask. If we all turn a blind eye then corruption will surely flourish.
But apparently if you re create a trust and take legal action to discredit the person who raises the questions you are home and hosed. The proof in civil cases is far less than in criminal cases and in my case the proof that I defamed Mr Wells is non existent. Truth is never defamatory If you don’t like people speaking the truth try acting differently .
Your articles are far more defamatory of me than what I ever said about Mr Wells all I invite you to do is to have a reporter contact me and I will take them through the shocking evidence which I have.. all obtained from official sources.
The truth will come out and I invite your paper to ensure that it is reported truthfully and accurately .
I will be posting this email to you on my blog https://anticorruptionnz.wordpress.com
I hope the NBR is as interested in facts as they should be .
Regards
Grace Haden
Anticorruptionnz's Blog 