It is official New Zealand functions on hot air and bull shit protected by a very solid brick wall of denial.
There are some who belive that this is a veil of corruption but I am now firmly of the belief that it is because it is because apathy, arrogance, ignorance and incompetence rule.
The Charities commission has accepted that the trust which registered with them in may 2007 called the animal welfare institute of New Zealand has more right to the name than the company which holds the trade mark.
The fact that the company took over from a legally registered trust by the same name appears to be beside the point and just because four people sign a document claiming that their trust had existed since 2000 then that too must be true.
Have the charity people not heard of verification???? And why shouldnt we all just use trading names just think of the confusion.. we could all call ourselves John Smith .. we have name registers for a reason. the reason I questioned the name animal welfare institute of New Zealand in the first place was because it was a law enforcement agency and Neil wells on the application to the minister had stated that the deed had been singed and that the registration was in process.
Judge Joyce decided that Mr Wells got a head of himself.. Try that one in court if you ever appear before his honour.. Well your honour I was doing 100 in a 50 area because there was a 100 kph area up the road I got ahead of myself.
Or I wasnt shop lifting I simply got ahead of myself I left the shop without paying.
If it works for barristers then it has to work f or the rest of.
It also worked for Neil wells when he applied for funding from the community board he said there was a trust but there wasnt one.. Any one else would have been done like a dog’s dinner but some how Neil Wells has immunity. He can
How to write legislation for his own business plan
Use the court to conceal corruption
Got his litigation funded through the public purse
Give false end titles to the lord of the rings movies
use any name he likes and cover up to such an extent that he undermines the entire company society and trust structures.
It would appear that Barristers who are members of the laingholm Baptist church can do anything and be immune to the law because they can spin their story and be believed on their word.
Who needs evidence when they have Neiil wells.. he will make it up he is a master of spin.
Proof of this is his statement to the court where he contradicted the Statement of Claim how can a person have two versions of the same story and have them both believed.
Even though I told the truth and had evidence of the truth I was accused.. but never found guilty of defamation.
The legal process was alos re written By wells and his acomplice lawyer Nick Wright who saw to it that I was denied a formal proof hearing and then convinced the court that I had had one.
Poor Nick was so confused that in one submission he got himself all tied up and contradicted himself But that Was Ok that was acceptable. para 56 and 62 of these submissions
I am the villian in the peace I should have known better than to question corruption.
Anticorruptionnz's Blog 