The headlines read Support swells for stray cats funding
Now there is a call for the residents of Hamilton to all contribute a few cents a year to the RNZSPCA, all this because the SPCA cannot deal with the stray cats.
First of all Only dog and stock control re the responsibilities of Council and unless there is some legislation which I am unaware of it has actually been ultra vires ( outside the scope ) for councils to become involved in animal welfare . Cats unless they are a health issue are not the responsibility of council .
Now I have heard that the SPCA has adopted a no kill policy.. very good humane wise but not so good given that some cats are not the type of animal you could re home who would want a wild cat ?
So the no kill policy effectively does two things..
1. It fills up the cattery, requires more staff requires more funds, keeps more friends family and associates employed ( this used to be done by volunteers) they spent an extra $100,000 in the past few years
2. It is a reason to plead poverty and ask for more funds
.. Isn’t keeping a cat in a cage at infinitum would be cruel and the animal is better off being put down humanely. Neil Wells who claims to be AWINZ has told the charities commission that he has funded studies on the stress suffered by animals kept in captivity.. Yes he is the same Neil wells who signed the deed where the $400,000 was slipped sideways.. do you feel like you are going in circles???
The Waikato SPCA trust and the Waikato RNZSPCA are two different entities.. One is a trust the other a society. The trust has the societies fund and appears to act with it as it likes it was going to be part and parcel of yet another recently formed trust the Waikato Animal Welfare Foundation which was going to build on the land at wintec .
The development officer at WINTEC is none other than the husband of mayor and chair woman of the RNZSPCA Julie Hardaker . Now as a lawyer you would think that she would be wanting to look a bit closer at the $400,000 which has left a visible trail through the charities commission and Societies web site.
She wears both the hats which should be concerned about the drain of these resources. I have covered this story earlier in Secrecy breeds corruption
You need only look at the article Update on Waikato shows who is who on the Waikato SPCA to see who was on the trust at the time.. How convenient that this proposed vet school was going to benefit the vet on the board of the SPCA
It should also be noted by any one looking at the accounts of the Waikato RNZSPCA that the accounts several years ago represented a number of bank accounts, now only the working account is listed. But it does not hide the fact that there have been significant donations to the RNZSPCA in the form of bequests over the years.
The ral issue with bequests is that those who leave money to the SPCA or RNZSPCA are not specific as to who should receive the money and there is apparently constant battles with regards to the terminology used in the individual wills as to where the money should go .. It has the ability to go anywhere and much does not go for the protection of animals but into investment plans and side trusts.
There is also no mention in the Waitakere RNZSPCA accounts of the money which the government gives to the RNZSPCA for the control of animals . I believe that stays with the main branch in Auckland and does not get distributed to the smaller societies.. This is so that they can individually plead poverty and tug at the heart strings of the public.
Then there is section 171 of the animal welfare act where by the approved organisation , which the Waikato branch of the RNZSPCA is , is able to keep the funds for prosecutions.. it would appear that the Waikato RNZSPCA dos not prosecute although it is an approved organisation by virtue of being a branch under the RNZSPCA section 190 animal welfare act.
Last but not least there are the smaller trusts which the money is siphoned off into in the case of the Waikato RNZSPCA I have identified the one above about which there is more information in Submission to the select committee where I wrote this
Mr Didovich also plays a key role in the RNZSPCA and Mr Wells is also a trustee of the Waikato SPCA trust which has taken over $400,000 charitable funds from the Waikato branch of the RNZSPCA , then dropped the corporate trustee RNZSPCA off the deed and then formed an entity in its own right.. Evidence of this is available from public records Societies register and charities commission. I will happily provide more evidence on this if required.
And in More submissions
“Transfers between charities could easily occur and could be a way for third parties to circumvent legislation by setting up as a charity . The definition of third party needs to be clearly defined.
1. On 15 May 2000 the Waikato SPCA trust was established . This trust had a corporate trustee being the RNZSPCA Waikato. The other trustees were Garrick , Dalton Shepherd and Wells .
2. Land belonging to the RNZSPCA was sold and as a result $400,000 was transferred from the RNZSPCA into the trust. ( this is verifiable through public records )
3. 12 may 2003 the trust amends the trust deed and drops off the corporate trustee .
4. IN 2005 it applies for incorporation to become an entity in its own right retaining the $400,000 and then becomes a charity .”
Other blog postings worth visiting they are
Whats happening in the Waikato RNZSPCA – Parallels with AWINZ? this article deals with $400,000 that was transferred from RNZSPCA Waikato to a trust which later becomes a legal entity in it is own right effectively having taken $400,000 assets from the Waikato RNZSPCA
The lack of verification -opens door to corruption
See also The role of Tom Didiovich … Trustee of AWINZ and RNZSPCA officer
I have a cat but if I lived in Hamilton and was expected to pay extra in my rates for the RNZSPCA to keep stray cats alive, I would protest very loudly. Councils need to stick to Council business – not look after stray cats or fund film studios…
Comment by Helen Wenley — 11/02/2011 @ 11:50 am