AWINZ is very well connected to Waitakere city , the connections of AWINZ to Waitakere and of Neil Wells with the Mayor Bob Harvey is well documented .
Mayor Bob in his cv refers to his days in advertising
In the mayors report 2005 mayor Bob makes special reference on Page 8 to his old colleague from advertising days.
Neil Wells in his CV makes reference to the same advertising agencies and in the CV he supplied with the affidavit he states “MacHarman Associates Ltd, accredited advertising agency: General Manager
• Managed (along with Bob Harvey – now Mayor of Waitakere) the 1972 General Election campaign that resulted in the election of the Norm Kirk government”
If you have the inclination to put documents and events in chronological order it can be demonstrated that significant events overlap in he two men’s career paths .
Neil Wells writes the first Animal welfare bill on behalf of Labour minister Pete Hodgson and placed it in what is called the private members bill ballot. He “won the ballot first time, an almost unheard-of event.”
So Neil Wells wrote the Bill with his ambition in mind but local Government New Zealand was to get in the way.
Wells became an independent advisor to the select committee which reviewed his bill and a second bill which had been introduced to overcome issues with the no1 bill written by Wells.
As a result of integration of the two bills Neil Wells sections with regards to approved organisations survived but not as he had intended.
Even before the bill was passed into Law Wells has his application in for the trust which has not been set up ( and by all accounts has not formally met )to become an approved organisation .
Not one of the statements made with regards to the trust was correct. Judge Joyce was to say of this that Mr Wells had got ahead of himself.
Proof that he had not “ got ahead of himself” was found in the Waitakere archives where in Wells own hand writing he had earlier that year made an application for funding for the non existent trust AWINZ and had stated at point 1.8 in the document dated October 1999, that the trust was in process of registration as a charitable trust.( incorporation ) he signs as a trustee of what he was to claim in court to be an Oral Trust to over come the difficulty that there was no trust deed until March 2000, he was to receive $700 funding from this application something I called fraud and something I was found guilty of for defaming Mr Wells.
(As a Former Police Officer and now a Private Investigator I can only apologise to Mr Wells for what the court tells me is my mistaken belief. I believe my opinion was true and based on real evidence, evidence which I was not allowed to produce in the court of law but will produce in the court of public opinion) Hence any judgement you will read with regards to this matter are scathing of me . While I had the evidence and could not produce it AWINZ and Wells had no evidence and were taken on their word.
Following the application made by Wells on behalf of AWINZ , MAF reviewed the application and on 24 December 1999 Maf wrote this to the minister it sets out their concerns .
In the intervening time public money pays for legal decisions which will ultimately set up this private trust , the decisions from Crown law were against the proposal .
But a Legal decision from Kensington Swan paid for by Waitakere city challenges the crowns points .
Treasury also expresses its concerns
But against these odds and without verifying that the trust exists or is incorporated as it claims to be , the newly elected labour cabinet approves the application .
From 2006 -2008 I made official information act requests but the information supplied was extremely sparse , entire pages were blanked out exposing only the few lines which answered he question I had put.
In January 2009 after the election of a new Government, I was invited back to Wellington and had access to MAF archives. The documents which I requested were supplied , I scanned these and put them in chronological order with documents I had obtained from the archives of Waitakere city.
And so documents which were never meant to be seen together found themselves consecutively placed on my files and the true picture emerged.
An example of this is that Waitakere City council deny that AWINZ operates from their premises but this communication from Wells to Maf would indicate something different being a $1 per year rental from Waitakere City .
As can be seen Wells was at that time a lecturer at Unitec that connection tomorrow.
Anticorruptionnz's Blog 
Leave a Reply